<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74646</link>
    <description>Stamping foils imported in running length for leather footwear were treated as embellishments for Notification No. 29/79-Cus because trade understanding and usage supported that description. A prior decision involving the same importers had already recognised stamping foils as embellishments and entitled them to concessional treatment, and the later absence of specific reference in ITC policy books did not displace that position. The record also did not show that the licensing period necessarily matched the date of import, so the earlier reasoning remained applicable. On that basis, the concessional benefit was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 273 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74646</link>
      <description>Stamping foils imported in running length for leather footwear were treated as embellishments for Notification No. 29/79-Cus because trade understanding and usage supported that description. A prior decision involving the same importers had already recognised stamping foils as embellishments and entitled them to concessional treatment, and the later absence of specific reference in ITC policy books did not displace that position. The record also did not show that the licensing period necessarily matched the date of import, so the earlier reasoning remained applicable. On that basis, the concessional benefit was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>