<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74632</link>
    <description>Imported automatic film processors were treated as eligible for concession under Customs Exemption Notification No. 11/77 because the Tribunal found the goods covered by earlier Tribunal decisions on the same or closely similar goods, and the revenue did not press any contrary position. On that basis, the exemption claim was accepted, the appellate order was set aside, and consequential relief followed for the importers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74632</link>
      <description>Imported automatic film processors were treated as eligible for concession under Customs Exemption Notification No. 11/77 because the Tribunal found the goods covered by earlier Tribunal decisions on the same or closely similar goods, and the revenue did not press any contrary position. On that basis, the exemption claim was accepted, the appellate order was set aside, and consequential relief followed for the importers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>