https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74599 Preventive detention is distinguished from punitive detention because the detaining authority fixes the detention period from the date stated in the order, and the Court expressed prima facie doubt that parole or erroneous release can extend that period. It also noted that the issue of rearresting a detenu after release under a High Court order later reversed, where the original detention period has expired, raises a tension between effective preventive detention and personal liberty and may need legislative intervention. The questions were referred to a five-Judge Bench for reconsideration of the law. en-us Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74599 Preventive detention is distinguished from punitive detention because the detaining authority fixes the detention period from the date stated in the order, and the Court expressed prima facie doubt that parole or erroneous release can extend that period. It also noted that the issue of rearresting a detenu after release under a High Court order later reversed, where the original detention period has expired, raises a tension between effective preventive detention and personal liberty and may need legislative intervention. The questions were referred to a five-Judge Bench for reconsideration of the law. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74599