<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 234 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74579</link>
    <description>Where an undefined tariff or notification term is construed, its meaning is determined by common parlance, trade understanding and contemporaneous practical recognition; on that basis, a Maruti Van was treated as a saloon car for the benefit under Notification No. 20/84-C.E. The document also states that extended limitation could not be invoked because suppression or mis-statement was not proved, particularly where the department acknowledged a genuine doubt about eligibility. As the notice was issued beyond six months from the relevant clearances, the demand was held time-barred. The assessee succeeded on both classification and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 234 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74579</link>
      <description>Where an undefined tariff or notification term is construed, its meaning is determined by common parlance, trade understanding and contemporaneous practical recognition; on that basis, a Maruti Van was treated as a saloon car for the benefit under Notification No. 20/84-C.E. The document also states that extended limitation could not be invoked because suppression or mis-statement was not proved, particularly where the department acknowledged a genuine doubt about eligibility. As the notice was issued beyond six months from the relevant clearances, the demand was held time-barred. The assessee succeeded on both classification and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>