<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 333 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74577</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by M/s. Godrej Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Bombay against an order passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay was dismissed due to being time-barred. The Bench rejected the request for condonation of delay of 37 days, citing insufficient cause and failure to meet legal requirements. The decision focused solely on the procedural aspect of the delay and did not delve into the merits of the case, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:44:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 333 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74577</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by M/s. Godrej Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Bombay against an order passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay was dismissed due to being time-barred. The Bench rejected the request for condonation of delay of 37 days, citing insufficient cause and failure to meet legal requirements. The decision focused solely on the procedural aspect of the delay and did not delve into the merits of the case, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>