https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74572 A finding remains one of fact even when it is drawn by inference from proved primary facts, and it does not become a question of law merely because it is inferred from evidence. The distinction applied was between a pure question of law, a mixed question of law and fact, and a factual conclusion. On that basis, shortage of gold, absence of bona fides, and alleged unauthorised parting with gold were treated as matters rooted in evidence and factual inference, while only pure legal issues or mixed questions involving the legal effect of proved facts were regarded as referable. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:31:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74572 A finding remains one of fact even when it is drawn by inference from proved primary facts, and it does not become a question of law merely because it is inferred from evidence. The distinction applied was between a pure question of law, a mixed question of law and fact, and a factual conclusion. On that basis, shortage of gold, absence of bona fides, and alleged unauthorised parting with gold were treated as matters rooted in evidence and factual inference, while only pure legal issues or mixed questions involving the legal effect of proved facts were regarded as referable. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74572