https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74552 The Tribunal held that the work undertaken involved both fabrication and erection, subjecting it to excise duty. Goods supplied for immovable property construction were also deemed liable for excise duty. The lack of evidence on fabrication nature and new goods led to the Revenue's appeal dismissal. en-us Tue, 17 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:25:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74552 The Tribunal held that the work undertaken involved both fabrication and erection, subjecting it to excise duty. Goods supplied for immovable property construction were also deemed liable for excise duty. The lack of evidence on fabrication nature and new goods led to the Revenue's appeal dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74552