<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 326 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74542</link>
    <description>An appellate authority cannot dismiss an appeal for default of appearance unless the governing procedural rules expressly confer that power; in the absence of such enabling authority, it must decide the matter on the available record or grant adjournment where warranted. The dismissal for default was therefore without jurisdiction, the appellate order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for disposal according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:04:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 326 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74542</link>
      <description>An appellate authority cannot dismiss an appeal for default of appearance unless the governing procedural rules expressly confer that power; in the absence of such enabling authority, it must decide the matter on the available record or grant adjournment where warranted. The dismissal for default was therefore without jurisdiction, the appellate order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for disposal according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>