<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 267 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74523</link>
    <description>Where material evidence supporting compliance with an exemption condition is produced late, the authority may still take it into account if it goes to the basis of the demand. The delayed end-use certificate was therefore condoned and had to be considered by the original authority on remand. Fresh adjudication was required after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing, and the demand was not finally sustained on the existing record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:29:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 267 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74523</link>
      <description>Where material evidence supporting compliance with an exemption condition is produced late, the authority may still take it into account if it goes to the basis of the demand. The delayed end-use certificate was therefore condoned and had to be considered by the original authority on remand. Fresh adjudication was required after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing, and the demand was not finally sustained on the existing record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>