<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 264 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74520</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi found the customs authorities&#039; assessment of Electrical Chemical Analysis Equipment as plastics under Heading 39.01/06 to be wrong. The matter is remanded for a new decision by the Assistant Collector of Customs, Bombay based on further evidence from the appellants. The appeal is allowed by remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:25:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 264 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74520</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi found the customs authorities&#039; assessment of Electrical Chemical Analysis Equipment as plastics under Heading 39.01/06 to be wrong. The matter is remanded for a new decision by the Assistant Collector of Customs, Bombay based on further evidence from the appellants. The appeal is allowed by remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>