<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 253 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74504</link>
    <description>Switch board cables used in telephone exchanges fell within Notification No. 197/79-C.E. as tele-communication wires and cables because they were supplied for telecommunication purposes and connected switch boards in exchanges. The notification exempted such cables when used as overhead, underground or overground tele-communication wires and cables, and excluded only internal housing cables ancillary to tele-communication purposes. The height at which the cables were laid was irrelevant, and the exemption could not be denied by reading into the notification a restriction not stated in its language. The same plain-meaning approach was supported by the earlier identical notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:52:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 253 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74504</link>
      <description>Switch board cables used in telephone exchanges fell within Notification No. 197/79-C.E. as tele-communication wires and cables because they were supplied for telecommunication purposes and connected switch boards in exchanges. The notification exempted such cables when used as overhead, underground or overground tele-communication wires and cables, and excluded only internal housing cables ancillary to tele-communication purposes. The height at which the cables were laid was irrelevant, and the exemption could not be denied by reading into the notification a restriction not stated in its language. The same plain-meaning approach was supported by the earlier identical notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>