<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 270 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74495</link>
    <description>Imported strips were held classifiable under Heading 73.15(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, because iron formed the predominant metal content and the relevant tariff note pointed to treatment as iron or steel articles. The claim that the goods should fall under Heading 75.02(1) as nickel alloy strips was rejected, and the classification adopted by the lower authorities was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:16:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 270 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74495</link>
      <description>Imported strips were held classifiable under Heading 73.15(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, because iron formed the predominant metal content and the relevant tariff note pointed to treatment as iron or steel articles. The claim that the goods should fall under Heading 75.02(1) as nickel alloy strips was rejected, and the classification adopted by the lower authorities was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>