<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74476</link>
    <description>Item No. 1 of the invoice was held eligible for reassessment under Tariff Item 84.61(2) because the plea was a legal ground that did not enlarge the original refund claim. On that basis, the item was accepted for reassessment and the consequential relief flowing from the reassessment was granted. The appeal succeeded only to that limited extent, and not as a full allowance of the entire claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:40:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74476</link>
      <description>Item No. 1 of the invoice was held eligible for reassessment under Tariff Item 84.61(2) because the plea was a legal ground that did not enlarge the original refund claim. On that basis, the item was accepted for reassessment and the consequential relief flowing from the reassessment was granted. The appeal succeeded only to that limited extent, and not as a full allowance of the entire claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>