<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 323 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74469</link>
    <description>Confiscation and valuation could not be sustained where the assessee was not confronted with the material used to enhance value and was denied a fair opportunity to rebut it. The enhancement rested on undisclosed documents treated as fresh evidence, so the adjudication was vitiated for breach of natural justice. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after supplying the relied-upon evidence and granting a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 323 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74469</link>
      <description>Confiscation and valuation could not be sustained where the assessee was not confronted with the material used to enhance value and was denied a fair opportunity to rebut it. The enhancement rested on undisclosed documents treated as fresh evidence, so the adjudication was vitiated for breach of natural justice. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after supplying the relied-upon evidence and granting a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>