<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 321 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74467</link>
    <description>Industrial laundry machines with spares were not classifiable as domestic electrical appliances under Item 33C because that entry was confined to appliances of the domestic type, even if used in hotels or shops. The goods were commercial laundry equipment used in industrial establishments, so the classification under Item 33C was rejected and Item 68 applied instead for reassessment of countervailing duty, with consequential refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 321 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74467</link>
      <description>Industrial laundry machines with spares were not classifiable as domestic electrical appliances under Item 33C because that entry was confined to appliances of the domestic type, even if used in hotels or shops. The goods were commercial laundry equipment used in industrial establishments, so the classification under Item 33C was rejected and Item 68 applied instead for reassessment of countervailing duty, with consequential refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>