<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 403 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74451</link>
    <description>Classification under Heading 84.61 depended on whether the imported system flow regulating valve answered the description of sub-item (2). The record contained no evidence showing that the goods fell within any of the categories covered by that sub-heading, so there was no basis to disturb the lower authority&#039;s classification. The appellant&#039;s claimed classification was therefore not accepted, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 403 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74451</link>
      <description>Classification under Heading 84.61 depended on whether the imported system flow regulating valve answered the description of sub-item (2). The record contained no evidence showing that the goods fell within any of the categories covered by that sub-heading, so there was no basis to disturb the lower authority&#039;s classification. The appellant&#039;s claimed classification was therefore not accepted, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>