<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 287 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74434</link>
    <description>Imported pulse generators were treated as covered by the complete exemption entry because the supporting certificate described them as test equipment for Collins VHF airborne equipment and the explanation showed them to be signal equipment used in connection with radar. On that basis, the goods answered the description in Serial No. 5(i) of Exemption Notification No. 206/76-Customs dated 2-8-1976, so the exemption benefit was granted with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 287 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74434</link>
      <description>Imported pulse generators were treated as covered by the complete exemption entry because the supporting certificate described them as test equipment for Collins VHF airborne equipment and the explanation showed them to be signal equipment used in connection with radar. On that basis, the goods answered the description in Serial No. 5(i) of Exemption Notification No. 206/76-Customs dated 2-8-1976, so the exemption benefit was granted with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>