<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 262 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74424</link>
    <description>Troughs cut out from cold rolled sheets were treated as scrap wholly used and consumed in the manufacture of ingots, so they merged with the ingots in the same manner as other steel manufacturing scrap. On that basis, and following earlier identical Tribunal decisions, the demand was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed. The discussion also considered whether Notification No. 75/67 dated 20-5-1967 applied, but the decisive point was the character and end-use of the troughs as manufacturing scrap.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 262 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74424</link>
      <description>Troughs cut out from cold rolled sheets were treated as scrap wholly used and consumed in the manufacture of ingots, so they merged with the ingots in the same manner as other steel manufacturing scrap. On that basis, and following earlier identical Tribunal decisions, the demand was held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed. The discussion also considered whether Notification No. 75/67 dated 20-5-1967 applied, but the decisive point was the character and end-use of the troughs as manufacturing scrap.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>