<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 360 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74367</link>
    <description>Hydrogen chloride gas was considered for classification under Item 14G of the Central Excise Tariff as hydrochloric acid or its anhydride. Relying on an earlier Tribunal ruling on the same product, the classification analysis concluded that hydrogen chloride gas is neither hydrochloric acid nor anhydride thereof and therefore does not fall within Item 14G. The product was held outside that tariff entry, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 360 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74367</link>
      <description>Hydrogen chloride gas was considered for classification under Item 14G of the Central Excise Tariff as hydrochloric acid or its anhydride. Relying on an earlier Tribunal ruling on the same product, the classification analysis concluded that hydrogen chloride gas is neither hydrochloric acid nor anhydride thereof and therefore does not fall within Item 14G. The product was held outside that tariff entry, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>