<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 354 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74361</link>
    <description>Under erstwhile Section 128 of the Customs Act, an appeal filed before the Appellate Collector after the prescribed six-month period could not be entertained by the Tribunal through condonation of delay. The Tribunal reiterated its consistent view that it had no power to extend the statutory limitation period for such appeals. On that basis, the delayed appeal was treated as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:25:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 354 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74361</link>
      <description>Under erstwhile Section 128 of the Customs Act, an appeal filed before the Appellate Collector after the prescribed six-month period could not be entertained by the Tribunal through condonation of delay. The Tribunal reiterated its consistent view that it had no power to extend the statutory limitation period for such appeals. On that basis, the delayed appeal was treated as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>