<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 317 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74354</link>
    <description>Where an adjudication involving factual inquiry is found to have breached natural justice, the proper course is to set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh adjudication after giving the affected party due opportunity. The Tribunal accepted the objection limited to breach of natural justice, held that the appellate and original orders could not stand, and restored the dispute to the original authority for reconsideration on merits in compliance with procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:13:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 317 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74354</link>
      <description>Where an adjudication involving factual inquiry is found to have breached natural justice, the proper course is to set aside the order and remit the matter for fresh adjudication after giving the affected party due opportunity. The Tribunal accepted the objection limited to breach of natural justice, held that the appellate and original orders could not stand, and restored the dispute to the original authority for reconsideration on merits in compliance with procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>