<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 311 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74348</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case, directing the correct classification of Precision Jig Grinder Machinery under Heading 84.45/48 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. It ordered separate duty assessments for accessories imported with the machinery. The decision underscores the importance of accurate classification and assessment in customs matters, ensuring adherence to legal provisions and rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 311 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74348</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case, directing the correct classification of Precision Jig Grinder Machinery under Heading 84.45/48 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. It ordered separate duty assessments for accessories imported with the machinery. The decision underscores the importance of accurate classification and assessment in customs matters, ensuring adherence to legal provisions and rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>