<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 316 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74346</link>
    <description>An imported DZM-180 mosaic character printer was not shown to be only a computer sub-system under Heading 84.51/55(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or entitled to concessional assessment under Notification No. 272/76-Cus. The material indicated that, although it was a printer, it was also suitable for telecommunication printing applications: the catalogue referred to use as an electronic digital computer output or telecommunication printing device, and the technical literature mentioned teletypes and teleinformatics. The scientific officer&#039;s letter did not resolve the telecommunication issue, and the 5 ms reference was treated as signal timing, not distance. The lower authorities&#039; assessment was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:00:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 316 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74346</link>
      <description>An imported DZM-180 mosaic character printer was not shown to be only a computer sub-system under Heading 84.51/55(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or entitled to concessional assessment under Notification No. 272/76-Cus. The material indicated that, although it was a printer, it was also suitable for telecommunication printing applications: the catalogue referred to use as an electronic digital computer output or telecommunication printing device, and the technical literature mentioned teletypes and teleinformatics. The scientific officer&#039;s letter did not resolve the telecommunication issue, and the 5 ms reference was treated as signal timing, not distance. The lower authorities&#039; assessment was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>