<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 214 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74329</link>
    <description>A provisional assessment order under excise law is treated as a decision or order within the statutory appellate scheme and is therefore appealable to the Tribunal. Maintainability cannot be denied merely because final assessment has not yet been completed, so an appeal against the Collector (Appeals) order was upheld as competent. By contrast, the request for stay of future clearances was rejected because the record showed no quantified demand and the circumstances did not justify invoking inherent powers for interim relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:59:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 214 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74329</link>
      <description>A provisional assessment order under excise law is treated as a decision or order within the statutory appellate scheme and is therefore appealable to the Tribunal. Maintainability cannot be denied merely because final assessment has not yet been completed, so an appeal against the Collector (Appeals) order was upheld as competent. By contrast, the request for stay of future clearances was rejected because the record showed no quantified demand and the circumstances did not justify invoking inherent powers for interim relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>