<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that Anhydrous Molasses did not qualify as &quot;Glucose&quot; under Item 1E of the Schedule but should be classified under Item 68. The marketability of Anhydrous Molasses was acknowledged, leading to its reclassification. The decision was based on technical literature, parties&#039; agreement on marketability, and the absence of evidence supporting its classification as Glucose. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of with the modified classification under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:46:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that Anhydrous Molasses did not qualify as &quot;Glucose&quot; under Item 1E of the Schedule but should be classified under Item 68. The marketability of Anhydrous Molasses was acknowledged, leading to its reclassification. The decision was based on technical literature, parties&#039; agreement on marketability, and the absence of evidence supporting its classification as Glucose. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of with the modified classification under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>