<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 227 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the latex foam sponge products should be classified under Item 16A(1) of the Central Excise Tariff, rather than as motor vehicle parts under Item 34-A. The reclassification sought by the respondents was rejected, affirming the initial classification by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise. The Central Government&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 36(2) was upheld, with the Tribunal finding sufficient reasoning for its intervention. The principle of res judicata in tax matters was acknowledged, and the relevance of end-use in product classification was dismissed, emphasizing the manufacturing state over the intended use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:20:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 227 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the latex foam sponge products should be classified under Item 16A(1) of the Central Excise Tariff, rather than as motor vehicle parts under Item 34-A. The reclassification sought by the respondents was rejected, affirming the initial classification by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise. The Central Government&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 36(2) was upheld, with the Tribunal finding sufficient reasoning for its intervention. The principle of res judicata in tax matters was acknowledged, and the relevance of end-use in product classification was dismissed, emphasizing the manufacturing state over the intended use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>