<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 208 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74278</link>
    <description>Contemporaneous documentary records supported lawful possession of gold ornaments, including an authenticated issue voucher and later-produced purchase and statutory account records, so confiscation and redemption fine were not sustainable on suspicion alone. The material did not establish that the gold was unaccounted for or liable to confiscation merely because records were not produced immediately. A limited contravention was, however, made out for failure to produce the records when required, so penalty could be imposed only for that procedural default and was confined to the statutory maximum for the limited offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 208 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74278</link>
      <description>Contemporaneous documentary records supported lawful possession of gold ornaments, including an authenticated issue voucher and later-produced purchase and statutory account records, so confiscation and redemption fine were not sustainable on suspicion alone. The material did not establish that the gold was unaccounted for or liable to confiscation merely because records were not produced immediately. A limited contravention was, however, made out for failure to produce the records when required, so penalty could be imposed only for that procedural default and was confined to the statutory maximum for the limited offence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>