<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 202 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector of Customs (Appeals) decision on duty demand for transit loss but directed a revision of duty demand by reducing duty on goods found short at the origin warehouse before transport. The interpretation of Section 23 of the Customs Act was central, with the Tribunal emphasizing the return of duty already paid on lost or destroyed goods under the section. The appellants&#039; claims for remission on warehoused goods under transit bond were rejected due to alleged failure in taking necessary precautions during transportation. The responsibility for goods lost during transit was debated, highlighting the importers&#039; obligation to ensure safe transport despite damages noticed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:11:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 202 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector of Customs (Appeals) decision on duty demand for transit loss but directed a revision of duty demand by reducing duty on goods found short at the origin warehouse before transport. The interpretation of Section 23 of the Customs Act was central, with the Tribunal emphasizing the return of duty already paid on lost or destroyed goods under the section. The appellants&#039; claims for remission on warehoused goods under transit bond were rejected due to alleged failure in taking necessary precautions during transportation. The responsibility for goods lost during transit was debated, highlighting the importers&#039; obligation to ensure safe transport despite damages noticed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>