<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 270 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74250</link>
    <description>Wind-shield glasses imported for additional duty of customs were required to be classified under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, because a prior Supreme Court ruling had already held that such motor-vehicle glasses do not fall under Item 23-A(4). Applying that binding classification principle, the contrary view taken by the lower authorities was rejected and assessment was to be made under Item 68, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 270 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74250</link>
      <description>Wind-shield glasses imported for additional duty of customs were required to be classified under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, because a prior Supreme Court ruling had already held that such motor-vehicle glasses do not fall under Item 23-A(4). Applying that binding classification principle, the contrary view taken by the lower authorities was rejected and assessment was to be made under Item 68, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>