<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74247</link>
    <description>Polyester-viscose resultant yarns were accepted as correctly classifiable under Item 18E of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act. On that footing, a demand under Item 68 on the full value of the goods was untenable. A further finding that duty was recoverable on the constituent yarns could not stand because it travelled beyond the show cause notice and the adjudication order. Any amount actually collected under the unsustainable demand was liable to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74247</link>
      <description>Polyester-viscose resultant yarns were accepted as correctly classifiable under Item 18E of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act. On that footing, a demand under Item 68 on the full value of the goods was untenable. A further finding that duty was recoverable on the constituent yarns could not stand because it travelled beyond the show cause notice and the adjudication order. Any amount actually collected under the unsustainable demand was liable to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>