<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 302 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74221</link>
    <description>Packing materials that are statutorily required to be returned by the buyer, with a refundable cost, are treated as returnable packing and excluded from the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal followed its earlier larger Bench ruling and distinguished the Supreme Court decision relied on by the appellant, because the present scheme did not depend on fixation of a maximum price under the Cement Control Order. On that basis, the cost of gunny bags used for cement packing was held not includible in the excise valuation, and the valuation excluding that cost was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:00:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 302 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74221</link>
      <description>Packing materials that are statutorily required to be returned by the buyer, with a refundable cost, are treated as returnable packing and excluded from the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal followed its earlier larger Bench ruling and distinguished the Supreme Court decision relied on by the appellant, because the present scheme did not depend on fixation of a maximum price under the Cement Control Order. On that basis, the cost of gunny bags used for cement packing was held not includible in the excise valuation, and the valuation excluding that cost was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>