<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 379 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74215</link>
    <description>A concessional customs duty benefit under Heading 84.66 was available only if the import contract was registered with customs before clearance of the goods. The appellants ed that the contract had not been registered within that time. Because the statutory precondition was not met, the concession could not be granted and strict compliance with the prescribed conditions was required for availing the tariff benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:50:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 379 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74215</link>
      <description>A concessional customs duty benefit under Heading 84.66 was available only if the import contract was registered with customs before clearance of the goods. The appellants ed that the contract had not been registered within that time. Because the statutory precondition was not met, the concession could not be granted and strict compliance with the prescribed conditions was required for availing the tariff benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>