<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 280 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. Indian Oxygen Ltd., stating that duty should be levied on goods based on ex-factory prices rather than ex-depot prices. They held that charges related to delivery and handling ex-factory should be included in the assessable value, while charges for cylinder rentals and interest on deposit receipts should not be included. The judgment emphasized that the assessable value should reflect the normal price at the place of manufacture, as established in previous cases like Usha Martin Industries and Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The Assistant Collector was directed to reevaluate the assessable value accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 280 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s. Indian Oxygen Ltd., stating that duty should be levied on goods based on ex-factory prices rather than ex-depot prices. They held that charges related to delivery and handling ex-factory should be included in the assessable value, while charges for cylinder rentals and interest on deposit receipts should not be included. The judgment emphasized that the assessable value should reflect the normal price at the place of manufacture, as established in previous cases like Usha Martin Industries and Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The Assistant Collector was directed to reevaluate the assessable value accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>