<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74208</link>
    <description>Excise valuation of disputed plywood could not be based on dealer quotations where the quotations were not shown to arise from any tender process, some were undated, and the quoted parties had not inspected the goods. The record did not establish a genuine market basis for valuing defective or rejected plywood, so the authorities were justified in rejecting the claimed assessable value and applying the applicable tariff value for commercial plywood. The differential duty demand was therefore sustained, and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74208</link>
      <description>Excise valuation of disputed plywood could not be based on dealer quotations where the quotations were not shown to arise from any tender process, some were undated, and the quoted parties had not inspected the goods. The record did not establish a genuine market basis for valuing defective or rejected plywood, so the authorities were justified in rejecting the claimed assessable value and applying the applicable tariff value for commercial plywood. The differential duty demand was therefore sustained, and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>