<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 271 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74191</link>
    <description>Printed circuits were treated as classifiable under heading 85.18/27(1), and that classification brought them within the scope of Notification No. 172/77-Customs. On that basis, the Tribunal accepted the common position of the parties that the notified exemption applied and that reassessment at the lower rate followed. The operative effect was entitlement to lower assessment for the goods as classified under the relevant heading with exemption benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 271 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74191</link>
      <description>Printed circuits were treated as classifiable under heading 85.18/27(1), and that classification brought them within the scope of Notification No. 172/77-Customs. On that basis, the Tribunal accepted the common position of the parties that the notified exemption applied and that reassessment at the lower rate followed. The operative effect was entitlement to lower assessment for the goods as classified under the relevant heading with exemption benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>