<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 200 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74177</link>
    <description>Finished tyre valves made of brass were not treated as a master alloy under Heading 74/01/02 because a master alloy is an alloying element or additive used in making alloys, not a finished article. The Tribunal accepted the revenue&#039;s classification view on the basis that brass construction alone did not convert the valves into master alloy goods, and held that the claimed tariff heading was inappropriate. The classification claim was rejected and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 200 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74177</link>
      <description>Finished tyre valves made of brass were not treated as a master alloy under Heading 74/01/02 because a master alloy is an alloying element or additive used in making alloys, not a finished article. The Tribunal accepted the revenue&#039;s classification view on the basis that brass construction alone did not convert the valves into master alloy goods, and held that the claimed tariff heading was inappropriate. The classification claim was rejected and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>