<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 307 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74172</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, affirming that the respondents&#039; method of recovering the cost of gas cylinders in installments over the cylinder&#039;s life span was valid and not a double recovery. The decision focused on interpreting the law regarding exclusion of packing cost, allowing deductions for cylinder costs, and determining the nature of recovery by the respondents, ultimately supporting the approach as a single recovery method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:06:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 307 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74172</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, affirming that the respondents&#039; method of recovering the cost of gas cylinders in installments over the cylinder&#039;s life span was valid and not a double recovery. The decision focused on interpreting the law regarding exclusion of packing cost, allowing deductions for cylinder costs, and determining the nature of recovery by the respondents, ultimately supporting the approach as a single recovery method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>