https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74170 A detenu under preventive detention was entitled to effective representation before the Advisory Board, including the right to adduce rebuttal oral and documentary evidence. Refusal to examine witnesses brought by the detenu was held to impair the Article 22(4) safeguard, because such material could influence the Board's opinion and the Government's decision on confirmation. The denial of an opportunity to prove that the seized currency was accounted for therefore vitiated continued detention, leading to quashing of the detention and immediate release. en-us Tue, 26 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:58:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74170 A detenu under preventive detention was entitled to effective representation before the Advisory Board, including the right to adduce rebuttal oral and documentary evidence. Refusal to examine witnesses brought by the detenu was held to impair the Article 22(4) safeguard, because such material could influence the Board's opinion and the Government's decision on confirmation. The denial of an opportunity to prove that the seized currency was accounted for therefore vitiated continued detention, leading to quashing of the detention and immediate release. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 26 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74170