<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 199 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74168</link>
    <description>Eligibility for cash assistance under the export scheme turned on compliance with the scheme&#039;s operative time limit. Exports made after the specified cut-off date were not eligible, even where the underlying contracts had been registered, because registration did not create an independent right to assistance beyond the notified period. Later amendments retained the same fixed-period approach to eligibility. Cash assistance was therefore not admissible for the disputed post-period exports, and the claim was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 199 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74168</link>
      <description>Eligibility for cash assistance under the export scheme turned on compliance with the scheme&#039;s operative time limit. Exports made after the specified cut-off date were not eligible, even where the underlying contracts had been registered, because registration did not create an independent right to assistance beyond the notified period. Later amendments retained the same fixed-period approach to eligibility. Cash assistance was therefore not admissible for the disputed post-period exports, and the claim was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>