https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74151 Entitlement to revalidation and endorsement of imprest licences for OGL imports was denied because the petitioners waited for an inordinate and unexplained period after completing export obligations and again before filing the writ petition. That delay and laches were treated as independently sufficient to refuse Article 32 relief, and the claimed Article 14 discrimination did not warrant interference. The Court also noted that reliance on earlier proceedings did not assist the petitioners, and the prior dismissal of special leave petitions was not treated as a decision on merits. The writ petition for mandamus therefore failed, while any separate appellate remedy under the policy remained unaffected. en-us Mon, 02 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74151 Entitlement to revalidation and endorsement of imprest licences for OGL imports was denied because the petitioners waited for an inordinate and unexplained period after completing export obligations and again before filing the writ petition. That delay and laches were treated as independently sufficient to refuse Article 32 relief, and the claimed Article 14 discrimination did not warrant interference. The Court also noted that reliance on earlier proceedings did not assist the petitioners, and the prior dismissal of special leave petitions was not treated as a decision on merits. The writ petition for mandamus therefore failed, while any separate appellate remedy under the policy remained unaffected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74151