<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74131</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 129B of the Customs Act, 1962 is confined to orders made under section 129B(1); an application seeking rectification of an order passed under section 129B(2) falls outside that statutory power and is not maintainable. The reference to the four-year rectification period did not cure the defect because the basic requirement of a rectifiable order was absent, so the application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74131</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 129B of the Customs Act, 1962 is confined to orders made under section 129B(1); an application seeking rectification of an order passed under section 129B(2) falls outside that statutory power and is not maintainable. The reference to the four-year rectification period did not cure the defect because the basic requirement of a rectifiable order was absent, so the application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>