<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 215 - CEGAT , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand for a de novo decision, directing the adjudicating authority to determine the ownership of the exercise books and reassess the statement of Shri V. Agarwal. The Tribunal also ordered the refund of Rs. 1,50,000/- deposited by the appellant under Section 35F of the Act, as the original order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:16:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 215 - CEGAT , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand for a de novo decision, directing the adjudicating authority to determine the ownership of the exercise books and reassess the statement of Shri V. Agarwal. The Tribunal also ordered the refund of Rs. 1,50,000/- deposited by the appellant under Section 35F of the Act, as the original order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>