<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 214 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74126</link>
    <description>Where assessable-value deductions are legally admissible but exact commodity-wise allocation is impracticable because of multiple factories and mixed product movement, freight, transit insurance, and taxes may be worked out on a rational pro rata average basis, subject to verification. Discounts and rebates stand on a different footing because they must be claimed in the price list and cannot be universally averaged; their admissibility and limitation issue were left for fresh examination in light of Supreme Court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 214 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74126</link>
      <description>Where assessable-value deductions are legally admissible but exact commodity-wise allocation is impracticable because of multiple factories and mixed product movement, freight, transit insurance, and taxes may be worked out on a rational pro rata average basis, subject to verification. Discounts and rebates stand on a different footing because they must be claimed in the price list and cannot be universally averaged; their admissibility and limitation issue were left for fresh examination in light of Supreme Court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>