<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay, stay applications, and appeals. It emphasized that the right to review orders without limitation under Section 131(3) was extinguished with the repeal of the section. The Tribunal found the department&#039;s reasons for the delay insufficient, noting the appeals were filed only after a favorable decision in a similar case, indicating no sufficient cause for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:58:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the applications for condonation of delay, stay applications, and appeals. It emphasized that the right to review orders without limitation under Section 131(3) was extinguished with the repeal of the section. The Tribunal found the department&#039;s reasons for the delay insufficient, noting the appeals were filed only after a favorable decision in a similar case, indicating no sufficient cause for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>