https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74111 Pre-execution interference with a preventive detention order under COFEPOSA is limited to exceptional cases: a writ court will ordinarily not restrain service of the order unless it is shown to be wholly unsupported by material, ab initio void, mala fide, or arbitrary. On the stated record, including recovery-linked material and non-compliance with summons, the text indicates the case did not meet that narrow threshold. It also states that writ interference with seizure and proposed confiscation of cash was declined because the petitioner had a statutory appellate remedy under the Customs Act and had not exhausted it, so the customs process was left to proceed. en-us Wed, 06 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:36:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74111 Pre-execution interference with a preventive detention order under COFEPOSA is limited to exceptional cases: a writ court will ordinarily not restrain service of the order unless it is shown to be wholly unsupported by material, ab initio void, mala fide, or arbitrary. On the stated record, including recovery-linked material and non-compliance with summons, the text indicates the case did not meet that narrow threshold. It also states that writ interference with seizure and proposed confiscation of cash was declined because the petitioner had a statutory appellate remedy under the Customs Act and had not exhausted it, so the customs process was left to proceed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74111