https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74110 Non-placement of a Magistrate's direction allowing retention of the passport did not vitiate preventive detention where the detaining authority had before it the remand application, judicial custody, repeated foreign travel, recovery of concealed gold and the detenu's admission of smuggling involvement; the omitted direction was not a vital or relevant circumstance. Failure to secure the detenu's next friend before the Advisory Board also did not invalidate the detention, because the detenu had identified that person's name and address and the authority was under no duty to locate and produce him. The preventive detention order was upheld. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74110 Non-placement of a Magistrate's direction allowing retention of the passport did not vitiate preventive detention where the detaining authority had before it the remand application, judicial custody, repeated foreign travel, recovery of concealed gold and the detenu's admission of smuggling involvement; the omitted direction was not a vital or relevant circumstance. Failure to secure the detenu's next friend before the Advisory Board also did not invalidate the detention, because the detenu had identified that person's name and address and the authority was under no duty to locate and produce him. The preventive detention order was upheld. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 08 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74110