<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 324 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74082</link>
    <description>ANFO, produced by mixing ammonium nitrate prills with fuel oil for blasting, is treated as a distinct prepared explosive under Chapter 36 because the mixture alters the character of the material and fits the tariff description; it is therefore liable to central excise duty. A simple mixing process and captive consumption do not prevent classification where trade understanding and Harmonised System Explanatory Notes support the tariff entry. Where the assessee&#039;s claim for Modvat relief under Rule 57-A was not examined by the lower authority and the record was insufficient for a final finding, the entitlement issue requires remand for limited consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 324 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74082</link>
      <description>ANFO, produced by mixing ammonium nitrate prills with fuel oil for blasting, is treated as a distinct prepared explosive under Chapter 36 because the mixture alters the character of the material and fits the tariff description; it is therefore liable to central excise duty. A simple mixing process and captive consumption do not prevent classification where trade understanding and Harmonised System Explanatory Notes support the tariff entry. Where the assessee&#039;s claim for Modvat relief under Rule 57-A was not examined by the lower authority and the record was insufficient for a final finding, the entitlement issue requires remand for limited consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>