<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 291 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74075</link>
    <description>The court upheld the interpretation allowing the separate importation of snap fasteners and zip fasteners, each up to 5% of the license value, dismissing the appeal and affirming the respondents&#039; entitlement to import the items separately. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurately interpreting the import policy&#039;s notes and entries to ascertain permissible imports within specified limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:56:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 291 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74075</link>
      <description>The court upheld the interpretation allowing the separate importation of snap fasteners and zip fasteners, each up to 5% of the license value, dismissing the appeal and affirming the respondents&#039; entitlement to import the items separately. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurately interpreting the import policy&#039;s notes and entries to ascertain permissible imports within specified limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>