<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 235 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74067</link>
    <description>Under the Import Policy 1983-84, an export house holding a transferred REP licence could not be denied endorsement for import of OGL items merely because the claim related to the additional replenishment entitlement in column 5 of Appendix 17. Paragraph 185 permitted export houses to import OGL items against REP licences issued in their own name or transferred to them, and the Court treated Appendix 17 as part of the same policy scheme. The benefit available for the basic entitlement under column 4 was therefore equally applicable to the additional entitlement, and the refusal to endorse the licence was unsustainable. The writ petition succeeded and endorsement was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=112346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 235 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74067</link>
      <description>Under the Import Policy 1983-84, an export house holding a transferred REP licence could not be denied endorsement for import of OGL items merely because the claim related to the additional replenishment entitlement in column 5 of Appendix 17. Paragraph 185 permitted export houses to import OGL items against REP licences issued in their own name or transferred to them, and the Court treated Appendix 17 as part of the same policy scheme. The benefit available for the basic entitlement under column 4 was therefore equally applicable to the additional entitlement, and the refusal to endorse the licence was unsustainable. The writ petition succeeded and endorsement was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>