https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74066 Registered exports under a firm contract were treated as governed by the Import Policy in force on the date of registration, so the replenishment entitlement was fixed by that policy and the contract terms. Because the exporters complied with the prescribed attestation requirements and the exports fell within the relevant delivery schedule or outer date recognised by a later public notice, the subsequent reduction in replenishment percentage did not defeat the accrued benefit. The challenge based on an alleged surrender of cash assistance failed on the facts, while the claim relating to ginger was not pursued. The petitioners were entitled to replenishment licence at 5% of FOB value and the corresponding cash assistance. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74066 Registered exports under a firm contract were treated as governed by the Import Policy in force on the date of registration, so the replenishment entitlement was fixed by that policy and the contract terms. Because the exporters complied with the prescribed attestation requirements and the exports fell within the relevant delivery schedule or outer date recognised by a later public notice, the subsequent reduction in replenishment percentage did not defeat the accrued benefit. The challenge based on an alleged surrender of cash assistance failed on the facts, while the claim relating to ginger was not pursued. The petitioners were entitled to replenishment licence at 5% of FOB value and the corresponding cash assistance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=74066